Gens at Windsor

Question

Why was Uvira's goal disallowed.

I know that a goal can't be scored by a high stick, but Uvira scored it no Sabourin.

I didn't know they could review a high stick on the play.

Goal should have counted. Uvira put the puck in the net and his stick was on the ice. The call on the ice was goal. The play SHOULD have been blown dead when Uvira touched the puck however it wasn't and that can't be reviewed. Big time blown call by the OHL video review judge.

Video replay really likes to disallow goal that involve sabourin

The game was not lost because of the disallowed goal...Windsor owned us today..we played hard for 10 minutes and got a 2-0 lead and then sat back and ran around...sorry...just calling a spade a spade...

While Boone and the guns are gone lets just dress 6 Fs.....its all we play anyways

I don't want to debate the game just the goal, does anyone have the list of reviewable plays?

I did a search online for the 2012 OHL rulebook and here is rule 38.4 and take a look at subrule viii and ix.
38.4 Situations Subject to Video Review - The following situations are
subject to review by the Video Goal Judge:
(i) Puck crossing the goal line.
(ii) Puck in the net prior to the goal frame being dislodged.
(iii) Puck in the net prior to, or after expiration of time at the end of the
period.
(iv) Puck directed or batted into the net by a hand or foot or deliberately
batted with any part of the attacking player’s body. With the use of a
foot/skate, was a distinct kicking motion evident? If so, the apparent
goal must be disallowed. A DISTINCT KICKING MOTION is one
which, with a pendulum motion, the player propels the puck with his
skate into the net. If the Video Goal Judge determines that it was put
into the net by an attacking player using a distinct kicking motion, it
must be ruled NO GOAL. This would also be true even if the puck,
after being kicked, deflects off any other player of either team and
then into the net. This is still NO GOAL. See also 49.2.
(v) Puck deflected directly into the net off an Official.
(vi) Puck struck with a high-stick, above the height of the crossbar, by an
attacking player prior to entering the goal. The determining factor is
where the puck makes contact with the stick in relation to the
crossbar. If the puck makes contact with the portion of the stick that is
at or below the level of the crossbar and enters the goal, this goal
shall be allowed.
(vii) To establish the correct time on the official game clock, provided the
game time is visible on the Video Goal Judge’s monitors.
(viii) Puck hand passed to a teammate in the offensive zone who
subsequently scores.
(ix) Puck high sticked to a teammate in the offensivezone who
subsequently scores.
(x) The video review process shall be permitted to assist the referees in
determining the legitimacy of all potential goals (e.g. to ensure they
are “good hockey goals”). For example (but not limited to), pucks that
enter the net by going through the net meshing, pucks that enter the
net from underneath the net frame, pucks that enter the net
undetected by the referee, etc.

thanks makes sense to me now

need to start rolling 4 lines, i know we are short handed, but need to find out if some of these kids can play.

Exactly! Nuff said!