Generals Message Board
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

42 man games lost

+3
archer_gens
generalsfan
LX
7 posters

Go down

42 man games lost Empty 42 man games lost

Post by LX Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:12 pm

So far we have had 3-10 game suspensions and 1-12 game. This is starting to get rediclous. Should we start taking bets on who's next to got a 10 game suspension.

LX

Number of posts : 190
Age : 37
Location : Oshawa
Seat Section : 114
Registration date : 2011-03-08

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by generalsfan Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:46 pm

We have 3x as many man games lost to suspensions than we have points in the standings.

generalsfan

Number of posts : 623
Location : Bowmanville
Registration date : 2007-04-01

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by archer_gens Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:20 am

Ya well I dunno if sabourin can count to the man games lost, does he even have a spot on the 20 man roster? Just saying we'd be sitting someone like him anyways. Either way still rediculous.
archer_gens
archer_gens

Number of posts : 3050
Age : 39
Location : oshawa
Seat Section : 118 row 1
Registration date : 2008-01-05

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by federo5 Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:03 pm

maybe if you start suspending the coach for multiple team suspensions than maybe the coaching staff will start coaching there team to play hard and SMART. Just saying

federo5

Number of posts : 34
Registration date : 2011-09-26

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by tone33 Sat Oct 29, 2011 1:21 pm

Don't forget about Lessio

tone33

Number of posts : 1
Registration date : 2011-10-29

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by LX Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:18 pm

I see sullentrop got a match cross check...... Wtf

LX

Number of posts : 190
Age : 37
Location : Oshawa
Seat Section : 114
Registration date : 2011-03-08

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by archer_gens Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:56 am

he deserved it, compared to some of the others at least
archer_gens
archer_gens

Number of posts : 3050
Age : 39
Location : oshawa
Seat Section : 118 row 1
Registration date : 2008-01-05

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by Gens-southern-fanclub Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:13 am

archer_gens wrote:he deserved it, compared to some of the others at least

That is kind of harsh for a dive. The cross check, which occurred after the interference, hit him high in the shoulders and then glanced off to the neck. Maybe a double minor or a major but no match and their player should have received an interference call. this kid is smiling on the bench afterwards and the reaction of the backup goalie says it all. He never missed a shift for this so called intent to injure. No way this is a match. The player gets an academy award for his acting and suelley gets Branch, doesn't seem fair. Meanwhile, 2 knee on knees the last two nights no calls come on

Gens-southern-fanclub

Number of posts : 69
Registration date : 2010-01-21

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by LX Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:02 am

That is what is really making me upset. These players lie on the ice till the penalty is called. Them get up and start smiling. That needs to be taken into account when it comes to the suspensions.

LX

Number of posts : 190
Age : 37
Location : Oshawa
Seat Section : 114
Registration date : 2011-03-08

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by Gens Camper Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:13 pm

Maybe we need to do the same - another 10 gamer

Gens Camper

Number of posts : 1838
Registration date : 2007-05-30

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by archer_gens Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:49 pm

maybe the guy took a dive but if your gonna check and hit a guy in the neck or head, ur gonna get called

maybe it won't be as long cause its a dive, but i'd rather see them suspend for something in the rule book, then for what Thomas got, which was a non intent to injure high sticking major and a ten game suspension

how one gets 10 games for not meaning to do something

sully checked higher then he should of in my opinion, maybe i need to watch it again
archer_gens
archer_gens

Number of posts : 3050
Age : 39
Location : oshawa
Seat Section : 118 row 1
Registration date : 2008-01-05

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by Gens-southern-fanclub Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:17 pm

I can't disagree more with the Thomas hit. His hit was a pure selfish play where Suelley's is a play that happens many many times during a game an aggressive play coming out of the corner and he just got to high with the stick that happens but it is NOT a match. Thomas purposely swung his stick out of frustration after a big hit. Now I disagree with the length of the suspensions but they will not get shorter.

Gens-southern-fanclub

Number of posts : 69
Registration date : 2010-01-21

Back to top Go down

42 man games lost Empty Re: 42 man games lost

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum